Post by n***@hotmail.comI remember looking up the blue book value a few years ago when I had a
dealer put it on consignment and I believe it was five or six hundred
bucks, so I have a suspicion you're talking about a different beast.
I don't know the history of this particular brand, but it's quite
possible that it has been re-issued at various times at different
quality levels--much like Fender Stratocasters, which are impossible to
price unless you know the manufacture date, the country of origin, etc.
At any rate, I would have to agree with Hotchkiss that this particular
guitar is a pretty solid Jazz box--by no means a Benedetto or an L-5,
and certainly not a collector's item--but if it *were* a collector's
item, I probably wouldn't be selling it :-)
Jonathan
The DeAlmond X155 seems to have a hard time with this group, but there
are other sites that give it good reviews.
I'm learning to play guitar, but want to learn about guitars too, all
sorts of guitars. Wasn't sure if I really wanted an archtop (I really
like the 335 design), but thought I must at least try one out. After a
week or two of drifting towards the Epiphone Joe Pass, the local music
shop put the X155 in the window reduced from 650 (pounds sterling) to
499, so I went with the DeArmond. It's OK.
There's no real point in comparing it with a Gibson 175 that can cost
ten times the price. Who's ever going to claim it's as good, or be in
the position of choosing between the two. I didn't feel I had the
experience (the 'ears') to pick out a really good archtop - not to the
tune of 4000 - and I certainly haven't got the money. Potential buyers
will do what I did and compare it with other low-cost archtops.
I agree though that the year of manufacture won't matter. The story I
got was that Fender had the X155 made in Korea to a Guild pattern, and
fitted reasonable hardware, especially the USA made pickups. After a
year or two they found it was costing too much to make as a cheap
guitar, so downgraded the hardawre and pickups and put it out again
under the Squire name. Maybe some of the criticism of the DeArmond
comes from people who have played the Squire. I haven't seen the
Squire, but maybe that's OK too for what it tries to be. The thing that
might matter to buyers is not the year, but that it's the DeAmond
version with USA pups (if it is) and not the Squire. If you want what
info there is on the internet, try the DeArmond name rather than Guild.
Are you upgrading, and if so, what to?
Bob